<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grammar pet peeves [Updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/</link>
	<description>A blog about family, technology, and libraries</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-2868</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-2868</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-2918</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-2918</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-2966</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-2966</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-3182</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-3182</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-3225</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-3661</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-3661</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-3736</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-3736</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-3741</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-3741</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves-updated/#comment-3761</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familymanlibrarian.com/2008/06/27/grammar-pet-peeves/#comment-3761</guid>
		<description>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called "professional" blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see "it's" and "its" mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, in fact, “Those who wish to avoid the high cost of gasoline should not drive their cars” (plural once, plural always, to pick a fine nit).</p>
<p>The ones which really bother me are the errors on so-called &#8220;professional&#8221; blogs, which (should) have the benefit of trained writers and editors.  Every time I see &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; mixed up, my blood pressure edges one notch closer to the red line.  But then, we get what we pay for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
